Associated types connect a type placeholder with a trait such that the trait method definitions can use these placeholder types in their signatures. The implementor of a trait will specify the concrete type to be used in this type’s place for the particular implementation. That way, we can define a trait that uses some types without needing to know exactly what those types are until the trait is implemented.
We’ve described most of the advanced features in this chapter as being rarely needed. Associated types are somewhere in the middle: they’re used more rarely than features explained in the rest of the book but more commonly than many of the other features discussed in this chapter.
One example of a trait with an associated type is the trait that the standard library provides. The associated type is named Item
and stands in for the type of the values the type implementing the Iterator
trait is iterating over. In section of Chapter 13, we mentioned that the definition of the Iterator
trait is as shown in Listing 19-12.
pub trait Iterator { type Item; fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item>; }
Listing 19-12: The definition of the Iterator
trait that has an associated type Item
The type Item
is a placeholder type, and the next
method’s definition shows that it will return values of type Option<Self::Item>
. Implementors of the Iterator
trait will specify the concrete type for Item
, and the next
method will return an Option
containing a value of that concrete type.
Associated types might seem like a similar concept to generics, in that the latter allow us to define a function without specifying what types it can handle. So why use associated types?
Let’s examine the difference between the two concepts with an example from Chapter 13 that implements the Iterator
trait on the Counter
struct. In Listing 13-21, we specified that the Item
type was u32
:
Filename: src/lib.rs
struct Counter { count: u32, } impl Counter { fn new() -> Counter { Counter { count: 0 } } } impl Iterator for Counter { type Item = u32; fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> { // --snip-- if self.count < 5 { self.count += 1; Some(self.count) } else { None } } }
This syntax seems comparable to that of generics. So why not just define the Iterator
trait with generics, as shown in Listing 19-13?
pub trait Iterator<T> { fn next(&mut self) -> Option<T>; }
Listing 19-13: A hypothetical definition of the Iterator
trait using generics
The difference is that when using generics, as in Listing 19-13, we must annotate the types in each implementation; because we can also implement Iterator<String> for Counter
or any other type, we could have multiple implementations of Iterator
for Counter
. In other words, when a trait has a generic parameter, it can be implemented for a type multiple times, changing the concrete types of the generic type parameters each time. When we use the next
method on Counter
, we would have to provide type annotations to indicate which implementation of Iterator
we want to use.
With associated types, we don’t need to annotate types because we can’t implement a trait on a type multiple times. In Listing 19-12 with the definition that uses associated types, we can only choose what the type of Item
will be once, because there can only be one impl Iterator for Counter
. We don’t have to specify that we want an iterator of u32
values everywhere that we call next
on Counter
.
When we use generic type parameters, we can specify a default concrete type for the generic type. This eliminates the need for implementors of the trait to specify a concrete type if the default type works. The syntax for specifying a default type for a generic type is <PlaceholderType=ConcreteType>
when declaring the generic type.
A great example of a situation where this technique is useful is with operator overloading. Operator overloading is customizing the behavior of an operator (such as +
) in particular situations.
Rust doesn’t allow you to create your own operators or overload arbitrary operators. But you can overload the operations and corresponding traits listed in std::ops
by implementing the traits associated with the operator. For example, in Listing 19-14 we overload the +
operator to add two Point
instances together. We do this by implementing the Add
trait on a Point
struct:
Filename: src/main.rs
Listing 19-14: Implementing the Add
trait to overload the +
operator for Point
instances
The add
method adds the x
values of two Point
instances and the y
values of two Point
instances to create a new Point
. The Add
trait has an associated type named Output
that determines the type returned from the add
method.
The default generic type in this code is within the Add
trait. Here is its definition:
#![allow(unused)]
fn main() {
trait Add<Rhs=Self> {
type Output;
fn add(self, rhs: Rhs) -> Self::Output;
}
}
This code should look generally familiar: a trait with one method and an associated type. The new part is Rhs=Self
: this syntax is called default type parameters. The Rhs
generic type parameter (short for “right hand side”) defines the type of the rhs
parameter in the add
method. If we don’t specify a concrete type for Rhs
when we implement the Add
trait, the type of Rhs
will default to Self
, which will be the type we’re implementing Add
on.
When we implemented Add
for Point
, we used the default for Rhs
because we wanted to add two Point
instances. Let’s look at an example of implementing the Add
trait where we want to customize the Rhs
type rather than using the default.
We have two structs, Millimeters
and Meters
, holding values in different units. This thin wrapping of an existing type in another struct is known as the newtype pattern, which we describe in more detail in the “Using the Newtype Pattern to Implement External Traits on External Types” section. We want to add values in millimeters to values in meters and have the implementation of Add
do the conversion correctly. We can implement Add
for Millimeters
with Meters
as the Rhs
, as shown in Listing 19-15.
Filename: src/lib.rs
use std::ops::Add; struct Millimeters(u32); struct Meters(u32); impl Add<Meters> for Millimeters { type Output = Millimeters; fn add(self, other: Meters) -> Millimeters { Millimeters(self.0 + (other.0 * 1000)) } }
Listing 19-15: Implementing the Add
trait on Millimeters
to add Millimeters
to Meters
To add Millimeters
and Meters
, we specify impl Add<Meters>
to set the value of the Rhs
type parameter instead of using the default of Self
.
- To extend a type without breaking existing code
- To allow customization in specific cases most users won’t need
The standard library’s Add
trait is an example of the second purpose: usually, you’ll add two like types, but the Add
trait provides the ability to customize beyond that. Using a default type parameter in the Add
trait definition means you don’t have to specify the extra parameter most of the time. In other words, a bit of implementation boilerplate isn’t needed, making it easier to use the trait.
The first purpose is similar to the second but in reverse: if you want to add a type parameter to an existing trait, you can give it a default to allow extension of the functionality of the trait without breaking the existing implementation code.
Nothing in Rust prevents a trait from having a method with the same name as another trait’s method, nor does Rust prevent you from implementing both traits on one type. It’s also possible to implement a method directly on the type with the same name as methods from traits.
When calling methods with the same name, you’ll need to tell Rust which one you want to use. Consider the code in Listing 19-16 where we’ve defined two traits, Pilot
and Wizard
, that both have a method called fly
. We then implement both traits on a type Human
that already has a method named fly
implemented on it. Each fly
method does something different.
Filename: src/main.rs
trait Pilot {
fn fly(&self);
}
trait Wizard {
fn fly(&self);
}
struct Human;
impl Pilot for Human {
fn fly(&self) {
println!("This is your captain speaking.");
}
}
impl Wizard for Human {
fn fly(&self) {
println!("Up!");
}
impl Human {
fn fly(&self) {
println!("*waving arms furiously*");
}
}
fn main() {}
Listing 19-16: Two traits are defined to have a fly
method and are implemented on the Human
type, and a fly
method is implemented on Human
directly
When we call fly
on an instance of Human
, the compiler defaults to calling the method that is directly implemented on the type, as shown in Listing 19-17.
Filename: src/main.rs
Listing 19-17: Calling fly
on an instance of Human
Running this code will print *waving arms furiously*
, showing that Rust called the fly
method implemented on Human
directly.
To call the fly
methods from either the Pilot
trait or the Wizard
trait, we need to use more explicit syntax to specify which fly
method we mean. Listing 19-18 demonstrates this syntax.
Filename: src/main.rs
trait Pilot {
fn fly(&self);
}
trait Wizard {
fn fly(&self);
}
struct Human;
impl Pilot for Human {
fn fly(&self) {
println!("This is your captain speaking.");
}
}
impl Wizard for Human {
fn fly(&self) {
println!("Up!");
}
}
impl Human {
fn fly(&self) {
println!("*waving arms furiously*");
}
}
fn main() {
let person = Human;
Pilot::fly(&person);
Wizard::fly(&person);
person.fly();
}
Listing 19-18: Specifying which trait’s fly
method we want to call
Specifying the trait name before the method name clarifies to Rust which implementation of fly
we want to call. We could also write Human::fly(&person)
, which is equivalent to the person.fly()
that we used in Listing 19-18, but this is a bit longer to write if we don’t need to disambiguate.
Running this code prints the following:
$ cargo run Compiling traits-example v0.1.0 (file:///projects/traits-example) Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.46s Running `target/debug/traits-example` This is your captain speaking. Up! *waving arms furiously*
Because the fly
method takes a self
parameter, if we had two types that both implement one trait, Rust could figure out which implementation of a trait to use based on the type of self
.
However, associated functions that are part of traits don’t have a self
parameter. When two types in the same scope implement that trait, Rust can’t figure out which type you mean unless you use fully qualified syntax. For example, the Animal
trait in Listing 19-19 has the associated function baby_name
, the implementation of Animal
for the struct Dog
, and the associated function baby_name
defined on Dog
directly.
Filename: src/main.rs
trait Animal {
fn baby_name() -> String;
}
struct Dog;
impl Dog {
fn baby_name() -> String {
String::from("Spot")
}
}
impl Animal for Dog {
fn baby_name() -> String {
String::from("puppy")
}
}
println!("A baby dog is called a {}", Dog::baby_name());
}
Listing 19-19: A trait with an associated function and a type with an associated function of the same name that also implements the trait
This code is for an animal shelter that wants to name all puppies Spot, which is implemented in the baby_name
associated function that is defined on Dog
. The Dog
type also implements the trait Animal
, which describes characteristics that all animals have. Baby dogs are called puppies, and that is expressed in the implementation of the Animal
trait on Dog
in the baby_name
function associated with the Animal
trait.
In main
, we call the Dog::baby_name
function, which calls the associated function defined on Dog
directly. This code prints the following:
$ cargo run Compiling traits-example v0.1.0 (file:///projects/traits-example) Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.54s Running `target/debug/traits-example` A baby dog is called a Spot
This output isn’t what we wanted. We want to call the baby_name
function that is part of the Animal
trait that we implemented on Dog
so the code prints A baby dog is called a puppy
. The technique of specifying the trait name that we used in Listing 19-18 doesn’t help here; if we change main
to the code in Listing 19-20, we’ll get a compilation error.
Filename: src/main.rs
trait Animal { fn baby_name() -> String; } struct Dog; impl Dog { fn baby_name() -> String { String::from("Spot") } } impl Animal for Dog { fn baby_name() -> String { String::from("puppy") } } fn main() { println!("A baby dog is called a {}", Animal::baby_name()); }
Listing 19-20: Attempting to call the baby_name
function from the Animal
trait, but Rust doesn’t know which implementation to use
Because Animal::baby_name
is an associated function rather than a method, and thus doesn’t have a self
parameter, Rust can’t figure out which implementation of Animal::baby_name
we want. We’ll get this compiler error:
$ cargo run Compiling traits-example v0.1.0 (file:///projects/traits-example) error[E0283]: type annotations needed --> src/main.rs:20:43 | 2 | fn baby_name() -> String; | ------------------------- required by `Animal::baby_name` ... 20 | println!("A baby dog is called a {}", Animal::baby_name()); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot infer type | = note: cannot satisfy `_: Animal` error: aborting due to previous error For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0283`. error: could not compile `traits-example` To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
Filename: src/main.rs
Listing 19-21: Using fully qualified syntax to specify that we want to call the baby_name
function from the Animal
trait as implemented on Dog
We’re providing Rust with a type annotation within the angle brackets, which indicates we want to call the method from the Animal
trait as implemented on Dog
by saying that we want to treat the Dog
type as an Animal
for this function call. This code will now print what we want:
$ cargo run Compiling traits-example v0.1.0 (file:///projects/traits-example) Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.48s Running `target/debug/traits-example` A baby dog is called a puppy
In general, fully qualified syntax is defined as follows:
<Type as Trait>::function(receiver_if_method, next_arg, ...);
For associated functions, there would not be a receiver
: there would only be the list of other arguments. You could use fully qualified syntax everywhere that you call functions or methods. However, you’re allowed to omit any part of this syntax that Rust can figure out from other information in the program. You only need to use this more verbose syntax in cases where there are multiple implementations that use the same name and Rust needs help to identify which implementation you want to call.
Sometimes, you might need one trait to use another trait’s functionality. In this case, you need to rely on the dependent trait also being implemented. The trait you rely on is a supertrait of the trait you’re implementing.
For example, let’s say we want to make an OutlinePrint
trait with an outline_print
method that will print a value framed in asterisks. That is, given a Point
struct that implements Display
to result in (x, y)
, when we call outline_print
on a Point
instance that has 1
for x
and 3
for y
, it should print the following:
********** * * * (1, 3) * * * **********
In the implementation of outline_print
, we want to use the Display
trait’s functionality. Therefore, we need to specify that the OutlinePrint
trait will work only for types that also implement Display
and provide the functionality that OutlinePrint
needs. We can do that in the trait definition by specifying OutlinePrint: Display
. This technique is similar to adding a trait bound to the trait. Listing 19-22 shows an implementation of the OutlinePrint
trait.
Filename: src/main.rs
use std::fmt;
trait OutlinePrint: fmt::Display {
fn outline_print(&self) {
let output = self.to_string();
let len = output.len();
println!("{}", "*".repeat(len + 4));
println!("*{}*", " ".repeat(len + 2));
println!("* {} *", output);
println!("*{}*", " ".repeat(len + 2));
println!("{}", "*".repeat(len + 4));
}
}
fn main() {}
Listing 19-22: Implementing the OutlinePrint
trait that requires the functionality from Display
Because we’ve specified that OutlinePrint
requires the Display
trait, we can use the to_string
function that is automatically implemented for any type that implements Display
. If we tried to use to_string
without adding a colon and specifying the Display
trait after the trait name, we’d get an error saying that no method named to_string
was found for the type &Self
in the current scope.
Let’s see what happens when we try to implement OutlinePrint
on a type that doesn’t implement Display
, such as the Point
struct:
Filename: src/main.rs
use std::fmt; trait OutlinePrint: fmt::Display { fn outline_print(&self) { let output = self.to_string(); let len = output.len(); println!("{}", "*".repeat(len + 4)); println!("*{}*", " ".repeat(len + 2)); println!("* {} *", output); println!("*{}*", " ".repeat(len + 2)); println!("{}", "*".repeat(len + 4)); } } struct Point { x: i32, y: i32, } impl OutlinePrint for Point {} fn main() { let p = Point { x: 1, y: 3 }; p.outline_print(); }
We get an error saying that Display
is required but not implemented:
$ cargo run Compiling traits-example v0.1.0 (file:///projects/traits-example) error[E0277]: `Point` doesn't implement `std::fmt::Display` --> src/main.rs:20:6 | 3 | trait OutlinePrint: fmt::Display { | ------------ required by this bound in `OutlinePrint` ... 20 | impl OutlinePrint for Point {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^ `Point` cannot be formatted with the default formatter | = help: the trait `std::fmt::Display` is not implemented for `Point` = note: in format strings you may be able to use `{:?}` (or {:#?} for pretty-print) instead error: aborting due to previous error For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0277`. error: could not compile `traits-example` To learn more, run the command again with --verbose.
To fix this, we implement Display
on Point
and satisfy the constraint that OutlinePrint
requires, like so:
Filename: src/main.rs
trait OutlinePrint: fmt::Display {
fn outline_print(&self) {
let output = self.to_string();
let len = output.len();
println!("{}", "*".repeat(len + 4));
println!("*{}*", " ".repeat(len + 2));
println!("* {} *", output);
println!("*{}*", " ".repeat(len + 2));
println!("{}", "*".repeat(len + 4));
}
}
struct Point {
x: i32,
y: i32,
}
impl OutlinePrint for Point {}
use std::fmt;
impl fmt::Display for Point {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut fmt::Formatter) -> fmt::Result {
write!(f, "({}, {})", self.x, self.y)
}
}
fn main() {
let p = Point { x: 1, y: 3 };
p.outline_print();
}
Then implementing the OutlinePrint
trait on Point
will compile successfully, and we can call outline_print
on a Point
instance to display it within an outline of asterisks.
In Chapter 10 in the section, we mentioned the orphan rule that states we’re allowed to implement a trait on a type as long as either the trait or the type are local to our crate. It’s possible to get around this restriction using the newtype pattern, which involves creating a new type in a tuple struct. (We covered tuple structs in the “Using Tuple Structs without Named Fields to Create Different Types” section of Chapter 5.) The tuple struct will have one field and be a thin wrapper around the type we want to implement a trait for. Then the wrapper type is local to our crate, and we can implement the trait on the wrapper. Newtype is a term that originates from the Haskell programming language. There is no runtime performance penalty for using this pattern, and the wrapper type is elided at compile time.
As an example, let’s say we want to implement Display
on Vec<T>
, which the orphan rule prevents us from doing directly because the Display
trait and the Vec<T>
type are defined outside our crate. We can make a Wrapper
struct that holds an instance of Vec<T>
; then we can implement Display
on Wrapper
and use the Vec<T>
value, as shown in Listing 19-23.
Filename: src/main.rs
Listing 19-23: Creating a Wrapper
type around Vec<String>
to implement Display
The implementation of Display
uses self.0
to access the inner Vec<T>
, because Wrapper
is a tuple struct and Vec<T>
is the item at index 0 in the tuple. Then we can use the functionality of the Display
type on Wrapper
.
The downside of using this technique is that Wrapper
is a new type, so it doesn’t have the methods of the value it’s holding. We would have to implement all the methods of Vec<T>
directly on Wrapper
such that the methods delegate to self.0
, which would allow us to treat Wrapper
exactly like a Vec<T>
. If we wanted the new type to have every method the inner type has, implementing the Deref
trait (discussed in Chapter 15 in the section) on the Wrapper
to return the inner type would be a solution. If we don’t want the type to have all the methods of the inner type—for example, to restrict the Wrapper
type’s behavior—we would have to implement just the methods we do want manually.
Now you know how the newtype pattern is used in relation to traits; it’s also a useful pattern even when traits are not involved. Let’s switch focus and look at some advanced ways to interact with Rust’s type system.