概述
Writing an extension module is a relatively well-understood process, where a “cookbook” approach works well. There are several tools that automate the process to some extent. While people have embedded Python in other applications since its early existence, the process of embedding Python is less straightforward than writing an extension.
许多 API 函数在你嵌入或是扩展 Python 这两种场景下都能发挥作用;此外,大多数嵌入 Python 的应用程序也需要提供自定义扩展,因此在尝试在实际应用中嵌入 Python 之前先熟悉编写扩展应该会是个好主意。
使用 Python/C API 所需要的全部函数、类型和宏定义可通过下面这行语句包含到你的代码之中:
这意味着包含以下标准头文件:,<string.h>
,<errno.h>
,<limits.h>
,<assert.h>
和 <stdlib.h>
(如果可用)。
注解
由于 Python 可能会定义一些能在某些系统上影响标准头文件的预处理器定义,因此在包含任何标准头文件之前,你 必须 先包含 Python.h
。
Python.h 所定义的全部用户可见名称(由包含的标准头文件所定义的除外)都带有前缀 Py
或者 _Py
。以 _Py
打头的名称是供 Python 实现内部使用的,不应被扩展编写者使用。结构成员名称没有保留前缀。
Important: user code should never define names that begin with Py
or _Py
. This confuses the reader, and jeopardizes the portability of the user code to future Python versions, which may define additional names beginning with one of these prefixes.
头文件通常会与 Python 一起安装。在 Unix 上,它们位于以下目录:*prefix*/include/pythonversion/
和 *exec_prefix*/include/pythonversion/
,其中 prefix
和 exec_prefix
是由向 Python 的 configure 脚本传入的对应形参所定义,而 version 则为 '%d.%d' % sys.version_info[:2]
。在 Windows 上,头文件安装于 *prefix*/include
,其中 prefix
是向安装程序指定的安装目录。
要包含头文件,请将两个目录(如果不同)都放到你所用编译器的包含搜索路径中。请 不要 将父目录放入搜索路径然后使用 #include <pythonX.Y/Python.h>
;这将使得多平台编译不可用,因为 prefix
下平台无关的头文件需要包含来自 exec_prefix
下特定平台的头文件。
C++ users should note that though the API is defined entirely using C, the header files do properly declare the entry points to be extern "C"
, so there is no need to do anything special to use the API from C++.
大多数 Python/C API 函数都有一个或多个参数以及一个 PyObject* 类型的返回值。此类型是一个指针,指向表示一个任意 Python 对象的不透明数据类型。由于在大多数情况下(例如赋值、作用域规则和参数传递) Python 语言都会以同样的方式处理所有 Python 对象类型,因此它们由一个单独的 C 类型来表示是很适宜的。几乎所有 Python 对象都生存在堆上:你绝不会声明一个 类型的自动或静态变量,只有 PyObject* 类型的指针变量可以被声明。唯一的例外是 type 对象;由于此种对象永远不能被释放,所以它们通常是静态 对象。
所有 Python 对象(甚至 Python 整数)都有一个 type 和一个 reference count。对象的类型确定它是什么类型的对象(例如整数、列表或用户定义函数;还有更多,如 标准类型层级结构 中所述)。对于每个众所周知的类型,都有一个宏来检查对象是否属于该类型;例如,当(且仅当) a 所指的对象是 Python 列表时 PyList_Check(a)
为真。
引用计数非常重要,因为现代计算机内存(通常十分)有限;它计算有多少不同的地方引用同一个对象。这样的地方可以是某个对象,或者是某个全局(或静态)C 变量,亦或是某个 C 函数的局部变量。当一个对象的引用计数变为 0,释放该对象。如果这个已释放的对象包含其它对象的引用计数,则递减这些对象的引用计数。如果这些对象的引用计数减少为零,则可以依次释放这些对象,依此类推。(这里有一个很明显的问题——对象之间相互引用;目前,解决方案是“不要那样做”。)
总是显式操作引用计数。通常的方法是使用宏 来增加一个对象的引用计数,使用宏 Py_DECREF() 来减少一个对象的引用计数。宏 必须检查引用计数是否为零,然后调用对象的释放器, 因此它比 incref 宏复杂得多。释放器是一个包含在对象类型结构中的函数指针。如果对象是复合对象类型(例如列表),则类型特定的释放器负责递减包含在对象中的其他对象的引用计数,并执行所需的终结。引用计数不会溢出,至少用与虚拟内存中不同内存位置一样多的位用于保存引用计数(即 sizeof(Py_ssize_t) >= sizeof(void*)
)。因此,引用计数递增是一个简单的操作。
没有必要为每个包含指向对象的指针的局部变量增加对象的引用计数。理论上,当变量指向对象时,对象的引用计数增加 1 ,当变量超出范围时,对象的引用计数减少 1 。但是,这两者相互抵消,所以最后引用计数没有改变。使用引用计数的唯一真正原因是只要我们的变量指向它,就可以防止对象被释放。如果知道至少有一个对该对象的其他引用存活时间至少和我们的变量一样长,则没必要临时增加引用计数。一个典型的情形是,对象作为参数从 Python 中传递给被调用的扩展模块中的 C 函数时,调用机制会保证在调用期间持有对所有参数的引用。
However, a common pitfall is to extract an object from a list and hold on to it for a while without incrementing its reference count. Some other operation might conceivably remove the object from the list, decrementing its reference count and possible deallocating it. The real danger is that innocent-looking operations may invoke arbitrary Python code which could do this; there is a code path which allows control to flow back to the user from a Py_DECREF(), so almost any operation is potentially dangerous.
一个安全的方式是始终使用泛型操作(名称以 PyObject_
, PyNumber_
, PySequence_
或 PyMapping_
开头的函数)。这些操作总是增加它们返回的对象的引用计数。这让调用者有责任在获得结果后调用 。习惯这种方式很简单。
引用计数细节
The reference count behavior of functions in the Python/C API is best explained in terms of ownership of references. Ownership pertains to references, never to objects (objects are not owned: they are always shared). “Owning a reference” means being responsible for calling Py_DECREF on it when the reference is no longer needed. Ownership can also be transferred, meaning that the code that receives ownership of the reference then becomes responsible for eventually decref’ing it by calling or Py_XDECREF() when it’s no longer needed—or passing on this responsibility (usually to its caller). When a function passes ownership of a reference on to its caller, the caller is said to receive a new reference. When no ownership is transferred, the caller is said to borrow the reference. Nothing needs to be done for a borrowed reference.
Conversely, when a calling function passes in a reference to an object, there are two possibilities: the function steals a reference to the object, or it does not. Stealing a reference means that when you pass a reference to a function, that function assumes that it now owns that reference, and you are not responsible for it any longer.
PyObject *t;
t = PyTuple_New(3);
PyTuple_SetItem(t, 0, PyLong_FromLong(1L));
PyTuple_SetItem(t, 1, PyLong_FromLong(2L));
PyTuple_SetItem(t, 2, PyUnicode_FromString("three"));
Here, returns a new reference which is immediately stolen by PyTuple_SetItem(). When you want to keep using an object although the reference to it will be stolen, use to grab another reference before calling the reference-stealing function.
Incidentally, PyTuple_SetItem() is the only way to set tuple items; and PyObject_SetItem() refuse to do this since tuples are an immutable data type. You should only use for tuples that you are creating yourself.
Equivalent code for populating a list can be written using PyList_New() and .
However, in practice, you will rarely use these ways of creating and populating a tuple or list. There’s a generic function, Py_BuildValue(), that can create most common objects from C values, directed by a format string. For example, the above two blocks of code could be replaced by the following (which also takes care of the error checking):
It is much more common to use and friends with items whose references you are only borrowing, like arguments that were passed in to the function you are writing. In that case, their behaviour regarding reference counts is much saner, since you don’t have to increment a reference count so you can give a reference away (“have it be stolen”). For example, this function sets all items of a list (actually, any mutable sequence) to a given item:
int
set_all(PyObject *target, PyObject *item)
{
Py_ssize_t i, n;
n = PyObject_Length(target);
if (n < 0)
return -1;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
PyObject *index = PyLong_FromSsize_t(i);
if (!index)
return -1;
if (PyObject_SetItem(target, index, item) < 0) {
Py_DECREF(index);
return -1;
}
Py_DECREF(index);
return 0;
}
The situation is slightly different for function return values. While passing a reference to most functions does not change your ownership responsibilities for that reference, many functions that return a reference to an object give you ownership of the reference. The reason is simple: in many cases, the returned object is created on the fly, and the reference you get is the only reference to the object. Therefore, the generic functions that return object references, like PyObject_GetItem() and , always return a new reference (the caller becomes the owner of the reference).
It is important to realize that whether you own a reference returned by a function depends on which function you call only — the plumage (the type of the object passed as an argument to the function) doesn’t enter into it! Thus, if you extract an item from a list using PyList_GetItem(), you don’t own the reference — but if you obtain the same item from the same list using (which happens to take exactly the same arguments), you do own a reference to the returned object.
Here is an example of how you could write a function that computes the sum of the items in a list of integers; once using PyList_GetItem(), and once using .
long
sum_sequence(PyObject *sequence)
Py_ssize_t i, n;
long total = 0, value;
PyObject *item;
n = PySequence_Length(sequence);
if (n < 0)
return -1; /* Has no length */
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
item = PySequence_GetItem(sequence, i);
if (item == NULL)
return -1; /* Not a sequence, or other failure */
if (PyLong_Check(item)) {
value = PyLong_AsLong(item);
Py_DECREF(item);
if (value == -1 && PyErr_Occurred())
/* Integer too big to fit in a C long, bail out */
return -1;
total += value;
}
else {
Py_DECREF(item); /* Discard reference ownership */
}
}
return total;
}
类型
There are few other data types that play a significant role in the Python/C API; most are simple C types such as int
, long
, double
and char*
. A few structure types are used to describe static tables used to list the functions exported by a module or the data attributes of a new object type, and another is used to describe the value of a complex number. These will be discussed together with the functions that use them.
Python程序员只需要处理特定需要处理的错误异常;未处理的异常会自动传递给调用者,然后传递给调用者的调用者,依此类推,直到他们到达顶级解释器,在那里将它们报告给用户并伴随堆栈回溯。
For C programmers, however, error checking always has to be explicit. All functions in the Python/C API can raise exceptions, unless an explicit claim is made otherwise in a function’s documentation. In general, when a function encounters an error, it sets an exception, discards any object references that it owns, and returns an error indicator. If not documented otherwise, this indicator is either NULL or -1
, depending on the function’s return type. A few functions return a Boolean true/false result, with false indicating an error. Very few functions return no explicit error indicator or have an ambiguous return value, and require explicit testing for errors with . These exceptions are always explicitly documented.
Exception state is maintained in per-thread storage (this is equivalent to using global storage in an unthreaded application). A thread can be in one of two states: an exception has occurred, or not. The function PyErr_Occurred() can be used to check for this: it returns a borrowed reference to the exception type object when an exception has occurred, and NULL otherwise. There are a number of functions to set the exception state: is the most common (though not the most general) function to set the exception state, and PyErr_Clear() clears the exception state.
The full exception state consists of three objects (all of which can be NULL): the exception type, the corresponding exception value, and the traceback. These have the same meanings as the Python result of sys.exc_info()
; however, they are not the same: the Python objects represent the last exception being handled by a Python … except statement, while the C level exception state only exists while an exception is being passed on between C functions until it reaches the Python bytecode interpreter’s main loop, which takes care of transferring it to sys.exc_info()
and friends.
Note that starting with Python 1.5, the preferred, thread-safe way to access the exception state from Python code is to call the function , which returns the per-thread exception state for Python code. Also, the semantics of both ways to access the exception state have changed so that a function which catches an exception will save and restore its thread’s exception state so as to preserve the exception state of its caller. This prevents common bugs in exception handling code caused by an innocent-looking function overwriting the exception being handled; it also reduces the often unwanted lifetime extension for objects that are referenced by the stack frames in the traceback.
As a general principle, a function that calls another function to perform some task should check whether the called function raised an exception, and if so, pass the exception state on to its caller. It should discard any object references that it owns, and return an error indicator, but it should not set another exception — that would overwrite the exception that was just raised, and lose important information about the exact cause of the error.
A simple example of detecting exceptions and passing them on is shown in the sum_sequence()
example above. It so happens that this example doesn’t need to clean up any owned references when it detects an error. The following example function shows some error cleanup. First, to remind you why you like Python, we show the equivalent Python code:
下面是对应的闪耀荣光的 C 代码:
int
incr_item(PyObject *dict, PyObject *key)
{
/* Objects all initialized to NULL for Py_XDECREF */
PyObject *item = NULL, *const_one = NULL, *incremented_item = NULL;
int rv = -1; /* Return value initialized to -1 (failure) */
item = PyObject_GetItem(dict, key);
if (item == NULL) {
/* Handle KeyError only: */
if (!PyErr_ExceptionMatches(PyExc_KeyError))
goto error;
/* Clear the error and use zero: */
PyErr_Clear();
if (item == NULL)
goto error;
}
const_one = PyLong_FromLong(1L);
if (const_one == NULL)
goto error;
incremented_item = PyNumber_Add(item, const_one);
if (incremented_item == NULL)
goto error;
if (PyObject_SetItem(dict, key, incremented_item) < 0)
goto error;
rv = 0; /* Success */
/* Continue with cleanup code */
error:
/* Cleanup code, shared by success and failure path */
/* Use Py_XDECREF() to ignore NULL references */
Py_XDECREF(item);
Py_XDECREF(const_one);
Py_XDECREF(incremented_item);
return rv; /* -1 for error, 0 for success */
}
This example represents an endorsed use of the goto
statement in C! It illustrates the use of PyErr_ExceptionMatches() and to handle specific exceptions, and the use of Py_XDECREF() to dispose of owned references that may be NULL (note the 'X'
in the name; would crash when confronted with a NULL reference). It is important that the variables used to hold owned references are initialized to NULL for this to work; likewise, the proposed return value is initialized to -1
(failure) and only set to success after the final call made is successful.
The one important task that only embedders (as opposed to extension writers) of the Python interpreter have to worry about is the initialization, and possibly the finalization, of the Python interpreter. Most functionality of the interpreter can only be used after the interpreter has been initialized.
The basic initialization function is Py_Initialize(). This initializes the table of loaded modules, and creates the fundamental modules , __main__, and . It also initializes the module search path (sys.path
).
On most systems (in particular, on Unix and Windows, although the details are slightly different), Py_Initialize() calculates the module search path based upon its best guess for the location of the standard Python interpreter executable, assuming that the Python library is found in a fixed location relative to the Python interpreter executable. In particular, it looks for a directory named lib/python*X.Y*
relative to the parent directory where the executable named python
is found on the shell command search path (the environment variable PATH
).
For instance, if the Python executable is found in /usr/local/bin/python
, it will assume that the libraries are in /usr/local/lib/python*X.Y*
. (In fact, this particular path is also the “fallback” location, used when no executable file named python
is found along PATH
.) The user can override this behavior by setting the environment variable , or insert additional directories in front of the standard path by setting PYTHONPATH.
The embedding application can steer the search by calling Py_SetProgramName(file)
before calling . Note that PYTHONHOME still overrides this and is still inserted in front of the standard path. An application that requires total control has to provide its own implementation of Py_GetPath(), , Py_GetExecPrefix(), and (all defined in Modules/getpath.c
).
Sometimes, it is desirable to “uninitialize” Python. For instance, the application may want to start over (make another call to Py_Initialize()) or the application is simply done with its use of Python and wants to free memory allocated by Python. This can be accomplished by calling . The function Py_IsInitialized() returns true if Python is currently in the initialized state. More information about these functions is given in a later chapter. Notice that does not free all memory allocated by the Python interpreter, e.g. memory allocated by extension modules currently cannot be released.
Python can be built with several macros to enable extra checks of the interpreter and extension modules. These checks tend to add a large amount of overhead to the runtime so they are not enabled by default.
A full list of the various types of debugging builds is in the file Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt
in the Python source distribution. Builds are available that support tracing of reference counts, debugging the memory allocator, or low-level profiling of the main interpreter loop. Only the most frequently-used builds will be described in the remainder of this section.
Compiling the interpreter with the Py_DEBUG
macro defined produces what is generally meant by “a debug build” of Python. Py_DEBUG
is enabled in the Unix build by adding --with-pydebug
to the ./configure
command. It is also implied by the presence of the not-Python-specific _DEBUG
macro. When Py_DEBUG
is enabled in the Unix build, compiler optimization is disabled.
除了前面描述的引用计数调试之外,还执行以下额外检查:
额外检查将添加到对象分配器。
额外的检查将添加到解析器和编译器中。
检查从宽类型向窄类型的向下强转是否损失了信息。
许多断言被添加到字典和集合实现中。另外,集合对象包含
test_c_api()
方法。添加输入参数的完整性检查到框架创建中。
使用已知的无效模式初始化整型的存储,以捕获对未初始化数字的引用。
添加底层跟踪和额外的异常检查到虚拟机的运行时中。
添加额外调试到线程模块。
这里可能没有提到的额外的检查。
Defining Py_TRACE_REFS
enables reference tracing. When defined, a circular doubly linked list of active objects is maintained by adding two extra fields to every PyObject. Total allocations are tracked as well. Upon exit, all existing references are printed. (In interactive mode this happens after every statement run by the interpreter.) Implied by Py_DEBUG
.
有关更多详细信息,请参阅Python源代码中的 Misc/SpecialBuilds.txt
。