Aggregate
The aggregate functions supported by IoTDB are as follows:
Example: Count Points
select count(status) from root.ln.wf01.wt01;
Result:
+-------------------------------+
|count(root.ln.wf01.wt01.status)|
+-------------------------------+
| 10080|
+-------------------------------+
Total line number = 1
It costs 0.016s
Aggregation by level statement is used to group the query result whose name is the same at the given level.
- Keyword
LEVEL
is used to specify the level that need to be grouped. By convention,level=0
represents root level. - All aggregation functions are supported. When using five aggregations: sum, avg, min_value, max_value and extreme, please make sure all the aggregated series have exactly the same data type. Otherwise, it will generate a syntax error.
Example 1: there are multiple series named status
under different storage groups, like “root.ln.wf01.wt01.status”, “root.ln.wf02.wt02.status”, and “root.sgcc.wf03.wt01.status”. If you need to count the number of data points of the status
sequence under different storage groups, use the following query:
select count(status) from root.** group by level = 1
Result:
+-------------------------+---------------------------+
|count(root.ln.*.*.status)|count(root.sgcc.*.*.status)|
+-------------------------+---------------------------+
| 20160| 10080|
+-------------------------+---------------------------+
Total line number = 1
It costs 0.003s
Example 2: If you need to count the number of data points under different devices, you can specify level = 3,
select count(status) from root.** group by level = 3
Result:
+---------------------------+---------------------------+
|count(root.*.*.wt01.status)|count(root.*.*.wt02.status)|
+---------------------------+---------------------------+
| 20160| 10080|
+---------------------------+---------------------------+
Total line number = 1
It costs 0.003s
Example 3: Attention,the devices named wt01
under storage groups ln
and sgcc
are grouped together, since they are regarded as devices with the same name. If you need to further count the number of data points in different devices under different storage groups, you can use the following query:
select count(status) from root.** group by level = 1, 3
Result:
+----------------------------+----------------------------+------------------------------+
|count(root.ln.*.wt01.status)|count(root.ln.*.wt02.status)|count(root.sgcc.*.wt01.status)|
+----------------------------+----------------------------+------------------------------+
| 10080| 10080| 10080|
+----------------------------+----------------------------+------------------------------+
Total line number = 1
It costs 0.003s
Example 4: Assuming that you want to query the maximum value of temperature sensor under all time series, you can use the following query statement:
Result:
+---------------------------------+
|max_value(root.*.*.*.temperature)|
+---------------------------------+
| 26.0|
+---------------------------------+
Total line number = 1
It costs 0.013s
Example 5: The above queries are for a certain sensor. In particular, if you want to query the total data points owned by all sensors at a certain level, you need to explicitly specify *
is selected.
Result:
+----------------------+----------------------+
|count(root.*.wf01.*.*)|count(root.*.wf02.*.*)|
| 20160| 20160|
+----------------------+----------------------+
Total line number = 1
It costs 0.013s
Segmentation aggregation is a typical query method for time series data. Data is collected at high frequency and needs to be aggregated and calculated at certain time intervals. For example, to calculate the daily average temperature, the sequence of temperature needs to be segmented by day, and then calculated. average value.
Downsampling query refers to a query method that uses a lower frequency than the time frequency of data collection, and is a special case of segmented aggregation. For example, the frequency of data collection is one second. If you want to display the data in one minute, you need to use downsampling query.
This section mainly introduces the related examples of downsampling aggregation query, using the GROUP BY
clause. IoTDB supports partitioning result sets according to time interval and customized sliding step which should not be smaller than the time interval and defaults to equal the time interval if not set. And by default results are sorted by time in ascending order.
The GROUP BY statement provides users with three types of specified parameters:
- Parameter 1: The display window on the time axis
- Parameter 2: Time interval for dividing the time axis(should be positive)
- Parameter 3: Time sliding step (optional and should not be smaller than the time interval and defaults to equal the time interval if not set)
The actual meanings of the three types of parameters are shown in Figure below. Among them, the parameter 3 is optional.
The SQL statement is:
select count(status), max_value(temperature) from root.ln.wf01.wt01 group by ([2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2017-11-07T23:00:00),1d);
which means:
Since the sliding step length is not specified, the GROUP BY statement by default set the sliding step the same as the time interval which is 1d
.
The fist parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the display window parameter, which determines the final display range is [2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2017-11-07T23:00:00).
The second parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the time interval for dividing the time axis. Taking this parameter (1d) as time interval and startTime of the display window as the dividing origin, the time axis is divided into several continuous intervals, which are [0,1d), [1d, 2d), [2d, 3d), etc.
Then the system will use the time and value filtering condition in the WHERE clause and the first parameter of the GROUP BY statement as the data filtering condition to obtain the data satisfying the filtering condition (which in this case is the data in the range of [2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2017-11-07 T23:00:00]), and map these data to the previously segmented time axis (in this case there are mapped data in every 1-day period from 2017-11-01T00:00:00 to 2017-11-07T23:00:00:00).
Since there is data for each time period in the result range to be displayed, the execution result of the SQL statement is shown below:
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| Time|count(root.ln.wf01.wt01.status)|max_value(root.ln.wf01.wt01.temperature)|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
|2017-11-01T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440| 26.0|
|2017-11-02T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440| 26.0|
|2017-11-03T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440| 25.99|
|2017-11-04T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440| 26.0|
|2017-11-05T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440| 26.0|
|2017-11-06T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440| 25.99|
|2017-11-07T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1380| 26.0|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
Total line number = 7
It costs 0.024s
The SQL statement is:
select count(status), max_value(temperature) from root.ln.wf01.wt01 group by ([2017-11-01 00:00:00, 2017-11-07 23:00:00), 3h, 1d);
which means:
Since the user specifies the sliding step parameter as 1d, the GROUP BY statement will move the time interval 1 day
long instead of 3 hours
as default.
That means we want to fetch all the data of 00:00:00 to 02:59:59 every day from 2017-11-01 to 2017-11-07.
The first parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the display window parameter, which determines the final display range is [2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2017-11-07T23:00:00).
The second parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the time interval for dividing the time axis. Taking this parameter (3h) as time interval and the startTime of the display window as the dividing origin, the time axis is divided into several continuous intervals, which are [2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2017-11-01T03:00:00), [2017-11-02T00:00:00, 2017-11-02T03:00:00), [2017-11-03T00:00:00, 2017-11-03T03:00:00), etc.
The third parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the sliding step for each time interval moving.
Then the system will use the time and value filtering condition in the WHERE clause and the first parameter of the GROUP BY statement as the data filtering condition to obtain the data satisfying the filtering condition (which in this case is the data in the range of [2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2017-11-07T23:00:00]), and map these data to the previously segmented time axis (in this case there are mapped data in every 3-hour period for each day from 2017-11-01T00:00:00 to 2017-11-07T23:00:00:00).
Since there is data for each time period in the result range to be displayed, the execution result of the SQL statement is shown below:
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| Time|count(root.ln.wf01.wt01.status)|max_value(root.ln.wf01.wt01.temperature)|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
|2017-11-01T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180| 25.98|
|2017-11-02T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180| 25.98|
|2017-11-03T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180| 25.96|
|2017-11-04T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180| 25.96|
|2017-11-05T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180| 26.0|
|2017-11-06T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180| 25.85|
|2017-11-07T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180| 25.99|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
Total line number = 7
It costs 0.006s
The SQL statement is:
select count(status) from root.ln.wf01.wt01 group by([2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2019-11-07T23:00:00), 1mo, 2mo);
which means:
Since the user specifies the sliding step parameter as 2mo
, the GROUP BY statement will move the time interval 2 months
long instead of 1 month
as default.
The first parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the display window parameter, which determines the final display range is [2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2019-11-07T23:00:00).
The start time is 2017-11-01T00:00:00. The sliding step will increment monthly based on the start date, and the 1st day of the month will be used as the time interval’s start time.
The third parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the sliding step for each time interval moving.
Then the system will use the time and value filtering condition in the WHERE clause and the first parameter of the GROUP BY statement as the data filtering condition to obtain the data satisfying the filtering condition (which in this case is the data in the range of (2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2019-11-07T23:00:00], and map these data to the previously segmented time axis (in this case there are mapped data of the first month in every two month period from 2017-11-01T00:00:00 to 2019-11-07T23:00:00).
The SQL execution result is:
The SQL statement is:
select count(status) from root.ln.wf01.wt01 group by([2017-10-31T00:00:00, 2019-11-07T23:00:00), 1mo, 2mo);
which means:
Since the user specifies the sliding step parameter as 2mo
, the GROUP BY statement will move the time interval 2 months
long instead of 1 month
as default.
The first parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the display window parameter, which determines the final display range is [2017-10-31T00:00:00, 2019-11-07T23:00:00).
Different from the previous example, the start time is set to 2017-10-31T00:00:00. The sliding step will increment monthly based on the start date, and the 31st day of the month meaning the last day of the month will be used as the time interval’s start time. If the start time is set to the 30th date, the sliding step will use the 30th or the last day of the month.
The start time is 2017-10-31T00:00:00. The sliding step will increment monthly based on the start time, and the 1st day of the month will be used as the time interval’s start time.
The second parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the time interval for dividing the time axis. Taking this parameter (1mo) as time interval and the startTime of the display window as the dividing origin, the time axis is divided into several continuous intervals, which are [2017-10-31T00:00:00, 2017-11-31T00:00:00), [2018-02-31T00:00:00, 2018-03-31T00:00:00), [2018-05-31T00:00:00, 2018-06-31T00:00:00), etc.
The third parameter of the GROUP BY statement above is the sliding step for each time interval moving.
Then the system will use the time and value filtering condition in the WHERE clause and the first parameter of the GROUP BY statement as the data filtering condition to obtain the data satisfying the filtering condition (which in this case is the data in the range of [2017-10-31T00:00:00, 2019-11-07T23:00:00) and map these data to the previously segmented time axis (in this case there are mapped data of the first month in every two month period from 2017-10-31T00:00:00 to 2019-11-07T23:00:00).
The SQL execution result is:
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+
| Time|count(root.ln.wf01.wt01.status)|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+
|2017-10-31T00:00:00.000+08:00| 251|
|2017-12-31T00:00:00.000+08:00| 250|
|2018-02-28T00:00:00.000+08:00| 259|
|2018-04-30T00:00:00.000+08:00| 250|
|2018-08-31T00:00:00.000+08:00| 225|
|2018-12-31T00:00:00.000+08:00| 208|
|2019-02-28T00:00:00.000+08:00| 216|
|2019-04-30T00:00:00.000+08:00| 208|
|2019-06-30T00:00:00.000+08:00| 199|
|2019-08-31T00:00:00.000+08:00| 181|
|2019-10-31T00:00:00.000+08:00| 69|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+
The SQL statement is:
select count(status) from root.ln.wf01.wt01 group by ((2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2017-11-07T23:00:00],1d);
In this sql, the time interval is left open and right close, so we won’t include the value of timestamp 2017-11-01T00:00:00 and instead we will include the value of timestamp 2017-11-07T23:00:00.
We will get the result like following:
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+
| Time|count(root.ln.wf01.wt01.status)|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+
|2017-11-02T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-03T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-04T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-05T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-06T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-07T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-07T23:00:00.000+08:00| 1380|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------------+
Total line number = 7
It costs 0.004s
Level could be defined to show count the number of points of each node at the given level in current Metadata Tree.
This could be used to query the number of points under each device.
The SQL statement is:
Get downsampling aggregate query by level.
select count(status) from root.ln.wf01.wt01 group by ((2017-11-01T00:00:00, 2017-11-07T23:00:00],1d), level=1;
Result:
+-----------------------------+-------------------------+
| Time|COUNT(root.ln.*.*.status)|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------+
|2017-11-02T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-03T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-04T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-05T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-06T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-07T00:00:00.000+08:00| 1440|
|2017-11-07T23:00:00.000+08:00| 1380|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------+
Total line number = 7
It costs 0.006s
select count(status) from root.ln.wf01.wt01 group by ([2017-11-01 00:00:00, 2017-11-07 23:00:00), 3h, 1d), level=1;
Result:
+-----------------------------+-------------------------+
| Time|COUNT(root.ln.*.*.status)|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------+
|2017-11-01T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180|
|2017-11-02T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180|
|2017-11-03T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180|
|2017-11-04T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180|
|2017-11-05T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180|
|2017-11-06T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180|
|2017-11-07T00:00:00.000+08:00| 180|
+-----------------------------+-------------------------+
Total line number = 7
It costs 0.004s