网关性能测试
测试环境
- 测试工具:wrk,
- 服务器:CentOS7(虚拟机,宿主机:macbookpro),内存:2G,CPU:1,核数:2核
- 运行环境:Java8、Mysql-5.7、Nacos-1.1.3
- 网关启动参数:
- zuul配置(仅针对zuul,Spring Cloud Gateway没有做优化配置):
sop.api-config.timeout-seconds=0
sop.restful.enable=true
logging.level.com.gitee=info
# zuul调优
zuul.host.max-per-route-connections=5000
zuul.host.max-total-connections=5000
zuul.semaphore.max-semaphores=5000
ribbon.ReadTimeout=5000
hystrix.command.default.execution.isolation.thread.timeoutInMilliseconds=13000
logging.file=sop-gateway.log
65535
- wrk命令:
- Spring Cloud Gateway测试结果
8 threads and 200 connections
Latency 139.74ms 69.39ms 617.14ms 69.82%
Req/Sec 182.12 55.74 343.00 66.24%
43391 requests in 30.09s, 11.96MB read
Requests/sec: 1441.96
Transfer/sec: 406.96KB
结果说明,下同:
8 threads and 200 connections (共8个测试线程,200个连接)
(平均值) (标准差) (最大值)(正负一个标准差所占比例)
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
(延迟)
Latency 139.74ms 69.39ms 617.14ms 69.82%
(每秒请求数)
Req/Sec 182.12 55.74 343.00 66.24%
43391 requests in 30.09s, 11.96MB read (30.09秒内处理了43391个请求,耗费流量11.96MB)
Requests/sec: 1441.96 (QPS 1441.96,即平均每秒处理请求数为1441.96)
Transfer/sec: 406.96KB (平均每秒流量406.96KB)
- Spring Cloud Zuul测试结果
调用restful请求
- wrk命令:
- Spring Cloud Gateway测试结果
8 threads and 200 connections
Latency 120.14ms 58.30ms 513.85ms 67.47%
Req/Sec 210.47 54.26 770.00 69.37%
50301 requests in 30.10s, 7.53MB read
Requests/sec: 1670.97
Transfer/sec: 256.21KB
- Spring Cloud Zuul测试结果
综上所述,Spring Cloud Gateway在没有优化的情况下,压测表现比zuul好,但zuul的数据表现也不差,但是出现超时现象,总的来说还是Spring Cloud Gateway具有优势。
restart.sh
echo "Stopping sop-gateway-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar"
pid=`ps -ef | grep sop-gateway-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}'`
if [ -n "$pid" ]
then
echo "kill -9 的id:" $pid
kill -9 $pid
fi
nohup java -jar -verbose:gc -XX:+PrintGCDetails -XX:+PrintHeapAtGC -Xloggc:gc.log \
-XX:MetaspaceSize=128m -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=128m -Xms1024m -Xmx1024m -Xmn256m -Xss256k -XX:SurvivorRatio=8\
-XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC sop-gateway-1.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar\
--spring.profiles.active=dev --server.port=8081 &
tail -f nohup.out